Bored Members - Guests | Media | White Bored | Interview | Bored Anthem - Songs | Boredwaani | Cartoons | Facebook | Twitter | Login
Showing posts with label Sri Lanka. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sri Lanka. Show all posts

When Dinesh Karthik made Colombo seem like Chennai

by Gaurav Sethi


It took a hopelessly bleak situation, an almost lost match, to bring out the best in him. And the crowds.

Dinesh Karthik was born on June 1, 1985, in Madras. On March 18th, Dinesh Karthik was born again in Colombo. It was a Twenty20 delivery. It took all of eight deliveries for him to be born again. Everything you knew of Karthik before, ceased to exist. Karthik seized Bangladesh and our collective cricketing imagination in the matter of minutes.

For Karthik to be born again, he had to be forgotten yet again. It took Ravi Shastri to pull off yet another masterstroke. Yet to be dismissed in the tournament, Shastri backed Karthik to remain not out yet again – to such an extent, he nearly did not bat in the finals.

In a tricky chase, Vijay Shankar batting in his first T20 International innings, was promoted before Karthik. In the 17 deliveries he faced, Shankar too, like Karthik, was threatening to be born again. The four consecutive dot balls he faced, were poised to be linked to his Aadhar card. Would Shankar ever live down Shastri’s folly? But Shastri wanted him to separate himself as a man from a boy, what had happened?

And then Karthik happened. Not BossDK, but Karthik. Not switch hit Karthik, but Bang, Bang, Bang, Bang Karthik. Who was this imposter? Was he even an imposter? What did India know of Karthik? What did you know? What did I know? Were we too absorbed in the Mahi fandom to even give another wicket keeping batsman an outside chance? Were we any different from the selectors for more than a decade? Were we also confusing formats?

Was Karthik’s batting, forgotten in the shadow of his wicket keeping? Or was it in the shadow of the aura of the big Banyan tree that was Dhoni?

Who knew that Dinesh Karthik was the man of the match in India’s first T20 international match more than 12 years back. That from that match, only he, Dhoni and Raina play for India now. That was also the only T20 match, Tendulkar represented India in. In a relatively low scoring match, Karthik scored 31. He did not keep wickets.

Only recently, the Kolkota Knight Riders (KKR) did not retain Gautam Gambhir, instead, they made Dinesh Karthik their captain. As trending cricket jokes go, that cut through Twitter. Almost everybody laughed. Such is the perception of Karthik as a player. He made his Test debut more than a year before Dhoni, his ODI debut a month before Dhoni, and his T20I debut in the same match as Dhoni. While he won the match, Dhoni failed to score.

Then again, it wasn’t as if Karthik didn’t have his share of chances. Or did he? Even when he looked to be batting better than anyone in the ODI team, he failed to convert those brilliant cameos (as in the West Indies in 2009) into something more substantial. Opening the innings in Kingston, he scored a quick 67. But it will be Yuvraj’s 131 that will be remembered from that match. In a reduced 27 over match, Karthik opened with a 43 ball 47. But it was Dhoni’s 34 ball 46 that won him the man of the match.

In his ODI career spanning 13 years, Karthik has played 79 matches with nine 50s but no hundreds. Dhoni has played in 318 ODIs. That Karthik has played so many and still remains part of India’s deeper selection consciousness is creditworthy.

That he has played only 19 T20 Internationals (including nine not outs) is somewhat of a mystery. Not that India plays many T20Is but Dhoni has played 89 T20Is in a similar time frame. In a way, it shows the frame of mind of India’s selectors – how they continue to mix and muddle formats?

While it is arguable that Karthik isn’t India’s first choice Test or ODI wicket keeper batsman, surely he makes the T20 squad on his batting alone?

For too long, India has been ODI crazy, and this has impacted both their Test and T20 selections – often sacrificing brilliant specialists just to see the wrong guy play the wrong format.

While T20 cricket isn’t only about what Karthik did yesterday, having a batsman or two who can plunder in the mix will always threaten to win you lost games. In T20, this threat is way more than in the other formats.

Not having such a batsman, especially a finisher who can switch matches in the blink of an eye, is spitting at the format.

In the 19th over, Dinesh Karthik twitched his way to the crease. Or did he? He often twitches. His is that kind of character. It’s as if there are ants in his pants. He often looks as if he’s breakdancing at the crease. Either that or some form of Karthik dance. It’s distracting.

Yesterday though, Karthik did not twitch. He was still. He made Bangladesh twitch. First ball six over long on. Next ball four. Third ball six over square leg. Colombo had become Chennai.

Five needed off one ball. Dinesh Karthik cover drives Soumya Sarkar for six. India wins. Dinesh Karthik does not twitch. He’s a journeyman cricketer. And on long cricketing journeys such as his, there are some off days, some on days. Later, Karthik will tell you (or did he?) that he was just on.

Oh, and while we’re at it, how about a little introduction. Hardik, meet Dinesh. It can often be lonely at the bottom. And what’s better than one T20 finisher? Surely two. Time to tango.  

First published here

Read more...

Feminazis Protest RAshwin's Attempted Dismissal of Thiriwhatshisname on Mistaken Etymological Grounds

by achettup

Feminazis the world over have taken strong exception to RAshwin's attempted dismissal of (insert long random annoying Sri Lankan name here) in the recent ODI between India and Sri Lanka in Brisbane. Feminazi Mr Warne (names have been changed to protect privacy) swore furiously when first informed of the attempted dismissal, but confirmed that the issue he and most other feminazis had was with the "etymological connotations and disrespect to women" of the popular term coined to describe such dismissals.

"Its not that we hate stupid, fat, unsporting Sri Lankans" began Mr Warne rather bizarrely. "We welcome their privilege to play the game the way they want to and then say at the press conference later that they don't play that way. Nothing wrong with that. Having said that, we don't have any issue with the manner in which RAshwin tried dismissing (insert long random annoying Sri Lankan name here)!" beamed a jubilant Mr Warne, knowing he had used the prized tactic of confounding everyone whilst drawing up sufficient attention to perfection.

There is always one idiot who feeds this frenzied attention whoring much-ado-about-nothing-but-hey-heres-a-mic-somebody-gotta-talk-let-me-at-least-I-can-do-it-for-a-cause (hey! that could be a Sri Lankan name if you remove the hyphens!), and some stupid Mr Manjrekar (name changed to protest privacy of the criminally stupid) then followed up with, "I don't get, what then is your issue, Mr Warne?" much to the undisguised delight of feminazi, Mr Warne.

"Well, here's my concern. If it was a woman's cricket match, we know they're not as soft as some people (snigger), but how would that dismissal have been reported? MAN-KADDED??? I mean, what a joke. Cricket has always been a game for the old men's club and the disgraceful terms they're using are another attempt to force subservience to women, making them utter "man" or "men" rather than something neutral like "thing" or "thang"... And before you ask, I'm not saying you should change it to womankadded, why can't we just use kadded? or thing-kadded?" [I know... thing cudded also inspires visions of bovine supremacy]

An astute observer Mr Bhogle (name changed just for kicks) wondered out loud "Now then. I _just_ wonder, how would Vinoo feel about all this! Surely he's not a thing, or a woman or a ma... well he is a man, but that can't be his fault now, can it?"

Note: This post is not offensive, because I endorse it. It is also not offensive because it mocks the litany of other blogs on this issue that revolve around equally stupid premises. You can take your stupid reasons for agreeing or disagreeing with the spirit or the law and shove it up your candy @$$3$! I have spoken. Because I have the right, like everybody else. And you have read that. Also, tomorrow I'll give my opinion on the impact of rising oil prices and Goldman Sach's role in this affair. THANQ

Read more...

Angelo's Alright

by Crownish

How could you take Angelo Mathews seriously?The scorecard says he took three wickets in an over in the semifinal of the T20 World Cup. But you and I know it was the inside edges and thigh pads that did the job then. I thought he'd get a few more games here and there before finding himself on his way out.

Sri Lanka thought they'd struck gold though and stuck with him. He turned up on Sri Lanka's tour of India. I snickered. When the commentator on AIR repeatedly called him Angela. When he ran himself out on 99 at Brabourne, as if he were Sri Lanka's answer to Shane Watson, all-rounder and nervous nineties nincompoop. I snickered when he had to return home midway through the following ODI series with an injury.


But then I went to see an IPL match this year. One SL player, Vaas, looked like he would finish the match early, lowering the vasool on my paisa. When another SL player, Mathews, however, stepped in and fought back. From guessing what over KKR would be all out by, we were now thinking KKR had it in them to go all the way this year. Mathews played and he flayed increasing my RoI and SRK's, even hitting a six in the row right in front of me. 
Cold logic had me make him the trump player in my fantasy team that day but he became a favorite from then onwards.

What I'm trying to say is, I'm an Bored Cricket Crazy Indian and I approve of Angelo Mathews.

Read more...

Malinga speaks the unspeakable truth.

by Gaurav Sethi

Read more...

The rapist pitch

by Dhaanu

Centuries ago, people used to call the pitch at the Sharjah a bowlers nightmare. The pitch on which the current match is going on and countless such airstrips masquerading as pitches in the subcontinent seem to have gone a step further. Just 4 wickets gone in just two days. That means a dismissal every one and a half session. A wicket every 44.3 overs. Heck, I could have survived a few overs on this "pitch".

Admitted, the bowling on display was not great. However as seen in the last match, a little help transformed the Indian pea shooters to at least the "competent" level. Here help was in the form of the opposing captain saying "I Declare". The Lankan bowlers must have cringed on hearing those words.

Anjelo Matthews was warned officially for running on the pitch. I have a sneaking suspicion that he purposely danced on the pitch so that he could be banned and his sanity saved. If that is the case, I admire the fella.

This ain't a bowlers' graveyard. After toiling hard, if you get a century of runs made against you, you would prefer to be dead. Graveyard is where the dead rest undisturbed. Bowlers would wish to go spend the rest of their lives in the grave if they were told to bowl on pitches like these for the rest of their lives.

This thing is an undead bowler rapist.

Read more...

One down

by RajaB

One opener got hurt within inches of his manhood. So who opens now?

Can we take a leaf out of that “Maa Ki” tour and get the wall of a player in first?

Or will it be the wicketkeeper-captain-material rated very highly by Greg Chappell?

If we indeed get the wall of the player one down, where will the Fake One Down Player play ?

Oh, it could also be Harbhajan.. The position is also called one drop, he did get one to drop down… the cameraman in the airport. So will it be him?

Who the @#$% is One Down??

Will there be anybody batting One Down for India?

Will he be for Real?

Return tomorrow evening, post match, for a postmortem.

Read more...

Wasn't Bored almost right or what?!

by Ankit Poddar

When the T20 World Cup was still to begin, when the Indian team were still supposed to win, I at Bored had some observations about the teams. Read them, before you read these!
Now, weren't those right or what!

South Africa reached the semi finals on account of their experience at IPL, and then lost it, on account of the same! A case in point being Duminy's experience with MI! But more importantly they choked again! How I wish I had betted on it!

Australia found it real hard without Roy, and they are unseeded for the next T20 WC now! Of course, because it is Oz, ICC may change some of the rules before next year!

India, well, still very raw! So, let us forget it! Just let them come back, got those effigies ready!

West Indies, okay I was wrong about them!

Sri Lanka, still don't like their outfits!

But Pakistan! Yes, so right about them! They had lost both their warm ups and are now into the Finals of T20 World Cup! Hail their inconsisntency!

Read more...

What would have South Africa done?

by Q

If it were South Africa playing New Zealand instead of Sri Lanka, then despite winning all its previous games and looking like the best team on paper, South Africa would have made sure they didn't qualify for the semi finals.


They did it in 2007.


Sri Lanka showed them how not to do it in 2009.


So then, how many teams (besides Australia) have reached the semis unbeaten and gone on to play the final?

Read more...

What Kind of a Format Allows...

by Q

Pakistan to qualify for the semi finals after beating New Zealand, Netherlands, and Ireland...


But doesn't ensure Sri Lanka a spot after they have beaten Australia, West Indies, and Pakistan?

Am I the only one who sees something wrong with this?


Read more...

Damith's moment of the Sri Lanka vs. Australia game

by Bored Guest

when calamity jehan made his way to the middle they showed isuru udanas profile video. though he won the game for sl, jehan was not calamityless even for a minute.

long live calamity jehan!

For more on calamity, you can go here.

by Damith

Read more...

The T20 Carnival begins tomorrow!

by Ankit Poddar

Yeah, Bored was live last night, and I was one of those on the panel! I mention this, cause our moderators deserve a special thanks! It must have been one hell of a task for them!

So, the warm up matches are over, including the India-Pakistan warm up final! It is time for the T20 carnival to begin!

A quick look at the teams:

Ireland, Scotland, Netherlands, Bangladesh: The group of upsetters! It would be fun to watch, whose party they spoil!

Australia: Andrew Symonds has been sent back home! So reports Achettup! The Oz T20 teams now looks like those racist blokes really in need of some proteins, wait that could send all of them back, ala Warney!

South Africa: Any side that has benefited the most from the IPL, apart from India, in terms of match practice, it is these guys. Guess, CSA has a certain BRC management to thank!

New Zealand: Their reaching the semi finals is almost a given! After all it is an ICC tournament! Can't bet on it though! Want to bet on Saffers choking instead?

England and West Indies: Are very happy with winning against each other! May get out of the WC as soon as it begins! Of course, you know that!

Pakistan: They have lost both their warm up matches, so they are going a long way in this World Cup, on account of their inconsistency!

Sri Lanka: I hate their team outfits!

India: One loss, one win! Against somebody they have never won against, against somebody they have never lost any! Yeah, you can't comment much on their form! But they are the defending champions!

All that I would now add, Aane De!

Read more...

Bored Trivia

by Bored Guest

Older than the Ashes

More angst than an Ind-Pak

130 years of unbroken Cricket

Who says cricket in the Subcontinent is Boring?


by Damith

Read more...

11 players / 6 Allrounders = 320/8

by Bored Member

Achettup

Yusuf Pathan, Irfan Pathan and Ravindra Jadeja are in the side as genuine allrounders. Raina, Sehwag and Yuvraj can all bowl pretty decently. Rohit Sharma can bowl, but he didn't bowl too much. When was the last time you saw a side with 3 genuine allrounders still go ahead and use the 3 partnership breakers and one other guy who could roll his arm over? All in all 9 bowlers were used, they might as well have gone and used Gambhir and maybe even Dhoni could have given himself a bowl.

Its fun to have genuine allrounders at numbers 7,8 and 9. Its even more fun when they don't have to bat.

Read more...