Bored Members - Guests | Media | White Bored | Interview | Bored Anthem - Songs | Boredwaani | Cartoons | Facebook | Twitter | Login
Showing posts with label David Warner. Show all posts
Showing posts with label David Warner. Show all posts

Why Virat Kohli and AB de Villiers should not play in the same team

by Gaurav Sethi

When AB does those things, like plucking white balls, one-handed out of thin air, the world goes nuts. And that silly smile sits on Virat’s face – there is contentment. His world is at peace. He may even have attained nirvana at that precise moment. He’s sitting in the RCB dugout but for all you know, he could be in McLeodganj with the Dalai Lama.
Often Virat is in the middle, and he can speak to his buddy after yet another of AB’s Do-Not-Try-This-At Home feats. The glow on Virat’s face is nothing short of a girl marrying her bearded Prince charming.
At no point has Virat tried to hide his fanboy awe of AB. Why would he? How could he? How could anyone? The very reason you pick AB de Villiers in your team is for such superhuman feats.  
It’s another thing that such superhuman feats will always have a downside – they will make everyone around, including Virat, far less. There’s no way you can match AB, so why not just roll over and die? Or do nothing. He’ll take care of it. He’s a superhuman after all.
And while AB can string together some fantastic strokes and catches, he is but a foot-soldier in the team. He is not RCB’s captain, Virat is.
Virat, in his own way, can be quite a superhuman. But by now, don’t we know that in the superhero hierarchy, there is the super superhero, and his flunky? While AB was being referred to as Superman and Spiderman (the latter by Virat too), India’s cricketing superhero was enjoying way too much shade.
There isn’t much between Virat and AB in terms of runs this IPL – while the captain played all 14 league matches (530 runs, averaging 48.18, striking at 139.10), the Superman was unwell for two (480 runs, averaging 53.33, striking at 174.54). While the difference in strike rates is 35+, Virat’s strike rate was still way above par.
While both Virat and AB had an indifferent 2017 season, they both were in supreme form in 2016 where they lost to Sunrisers Hyderabad in the finals.
A final in which current SRH skipper, Kane Williamson did not feature. He played six of SRH’s 17 matches that season. The then captain, David Warner, played all matches, leading SRH to the IPL trophy.
In 2017, Williamson played seven matches but upped his strike rate from 101 to 151, his batting average too more than doubled from 20.66 to 42.66. Warner, though, was in another zone (combining the best of Kohli and de Villiers) - scoring 848 runs at a strike rate of 151.42, at an average of 60.57 in 2016; averaging 58.27, striking at 141 in 2017.
Williamson, though, had moved in from the sidelines. This season when Warner was unavailable, Williamson led SRH to the play-offs as table toppers. 661 runs, average of 60 at a strike rate of 143.
Forget the numbers for a moment, and stand the four cricketers alongside each other. What do you see? Warner captain, Williamson vice-captain? AB superman, and Virat?
While Virat’s role has always been similar to that of Warner’s, to bat high up (if not open) and go on to bat through the innings with varying degrees of acceleration; it is AB’s brilliance that has been a distraction – not just for the captain but for the team on a whole.
In the shade of AB’s brilliance, RCB has underachieved yet again under Virat’s captaincy. It may sound downright preposterous but for RCB to come together as a team, they may have to split the most beautiful pairing in the IPL.
Virat may make a far better captain when he is trying to dismiss AB with the ball. The awe will be intact, (as it no doubt was in the last Test series) but there will be a far greater focus – a competition between the two, which can only happen when the two play against each other. As team mates, Virat almost seems to shudder from the limelight. And that is pretty much going against the grain.
Of course, there are other ways to do it too, go about the auctions smartly but that’s asking too much of royally challenged Bangalore.

First published here

Read more...

Virat Kohli Open

by Gaurav Sethi

"It’s turning out to be that kind of month for former India cricketer Bishen Singh Bedi. First, the Supreme Court did to the Board of Control for Cricket in India what he’s been itching to do to them for years; then, his protégé, Parvez Rasool, is picked for India’s Twenty20 squad against England. What could possibly happen next for the straight shooting Bedi?"

Read the full post here 

Read more...

When scorpions fight to the finish

by Gaurav Sethi

There is much in common between Virat Kohli and David Warner:  Bully openers, closure masters, boss captains. While one had anger management issues, the other continues to fuel his cricket with fury.  Both share the same star sign, Scorpio. Both are in their late 20s, Kohli’s 27, Warner’s 29. Both have the identical top score in T20 internationals, a 90 not out.

Both are full-on Aussie in their approach to sport. Both have curbed their natural T20 instincts, preferring to battle boredom for the team. Both want to win this IPL so bad you can almost taste it on TV. Both have just about done enough to win it on their own. Going into the finals, Kohli has 919 runs, Warner, 779 runs. That’s the top two run scorers this IPL.

Both their cricket journeys have been shaped by Delhi in no small way. While Kohli is from Delhi, Warner’s opening for Delhi Daredevils (under Virender Sehwag) by his own admission, defined his game -

“When I went to Dehli, Sehwag watched me a couple of times and said to me, ‘You’ll be a better Test cricketer than what you will be a Twenty20 player’.”

And can both field. They hurl themselves at the cricket ball as if a magnetic field were pulling them to it. Both did not open in the World T20, but after this IPL, who will stop them?

Tonight, only one will win the IPL.

After winning five back-to-back knock-out matches and making it to the finals, the trophy seems like just another routine chase under lights for Virat Kohli.

Kohli has in his XI, four outright match winners with the bat, Gayle, de Villiers, Watson and himself. Warner has just one: himself. He’s pushed this Sunrisers’ campaign with his bat and his bowlers. 

Even the absence of Ashish Nehra and Mustafizur Rahman hasn’t stopped him.

The IPL finals are at Chinnaswamy. For RCB, it’s not a home game, it’s a backyard game, with friends and extended family - 40,000 chants of R-C-Bee, R-C-Bee will be baying for Warner’s blood.

On 12th April, when the two played in Bangalore, RCB sucked the Chinnaswamy for all the runs it was worth – 228, beating SRH (Nehra and Mustafizur included) by 45 runs. Warner made a 25 ball 58. For RCB, Kohli 75, de Villiers 82 sealed the deal. When the Sunrisers returned home, they knocked off 194 beating RCB by 15 runs. That man Warner again, a 50 ball 92.  One-all, one to play. 

For RCB, off spinner, Parvez Rasool played both games. He played the last of his four games this season more than three weeks back. Will RCB play him again to counter the two left handers on top? Or will they expect Gayle to bowl with his big bat? Will Kohli risk his left arm spinner, Abdulla against Warner? Or will he go as Raina did with Jadeja against Warner, and not bowl him at all? What about the leg spinner, Yuzvendra Chahal?

What about out of favour Sarfaraz Khan? Has he shed enough weight to be picked? Not only is he an October 27 born like Warner, he tonked a 10 ball 35 when he played the Sunrisers, most of those runs were behind the wicket, scooping, paddling, doing all kinds of horrible things to Bhuvneshwar Kumar. Such was his impact that day, poor Bhuvi all but gave up on bowling yorkers till just the other day. RCB might find more of baby Sachin in Sarfaraz than they will in Sachin Baby. It’ll be a gamble worth taking, negating Bhuvi could be the game. Bad memories do strange things to sportspersons.

The other big call for RCB is gambling with Lokesh Rahul behind the stumps. It could not just cost them runs, it could cost them the trophy. The only way wicketkeeper, Travis Head makes it to the playing XI if Chris Gayle does not.

Chances are RCB will go with their same winning eleven. And a prayer. It’ll be down to Warner to dismiss Warner. And hoping the other left handers, Dhawan and Yuvraj don’t mess up Abdulla and Chahal too badly.  
 
Either way, a loss in the IPL final will not make either a lesser player. A win for Virat Kohli though, will feed the IPL dream like few things can. (Like Dhoni’s used to in his heyday, you remember?) It’ll add yet another chapter to that story he continues to write on the field. Through the covers. And sometimes, even in the dugout when he fails to score.

Read more...

The Border Gavaskar Trophy - T1 D1

by Homer

First things first - David Warner is finally living upto his billing of being the natural heir to Sehwag's legacy.

On the day after Sehwag tonked a double hundred in ODI cricket, 3 years ago, David Warner's boundary laced, emotional 145 set the foundation for what should have been a formidable Australian first innings total - that the day ended up with honors shared has plenty to do with India's bowling. And luck.

Plenty has been written about the bowling lengths - sure they could have been fuller, and straighter, but equally, the rewards might not have materialized. Australia could just as easily have ended the day at 250/2, and if the toss up is between 250/2 and 354/6, I know what I would go with.

Also, cognizance has to be taken of the fact that 3 of the four bowlers India played were playing their first test in Australia, on what is a belter of a wicket. If similar lines and lengths are persisted with on Day 2 of the Third test, then Houston, we have a problem. But on Day 1 of the first test, I would not sweat the short stuff.

And now, luck. Between David Warner's mistimed swipe off Karn Sharma, and Michael Clarke's back giving way, India should have played the lottery, thats how much luck they had.

Both are significant - another session of Warner, in form and riding on his 100, and the game, as a contest, was over, right there and then. And another session of Clarke, continuing on with from his 60, and onto three figures, and the Australian dressing room would have gotten the emotional and adrenaline boost that the past few weeks must have sapped out of them.

And Clarke's injury has a greater bearing on the test, and the series.

For tomorrow, India's best chance would be to take the remaining four wickets quickly, but I dont see how Australia can be restricted to below 400 - Harris, Johnson and Siddle can all bat, and a few aada-patta shots should see them cross 400 easily. What is important from an Indian POV is that number should not grow greater than that.

And while the pitch remains a belter, my Indian game plan would be to play for time, not runs. Here's why -

  • None of the Australian bowlers have bowled a ball in anger for over a month now - 
    • Harris last played in mid November, coming off of his knee surgery
    • Johnson hasnt bowlewd since his toe injury
    • Siddle is under pressure to justify his spot after the debacle in the desert
  • Keep them on the field for sufficiently long periods of time, and fatigue and fitness will become issues. And with back to back to back tests, it becomes critical.
  • Prolonged periods on the field will also test Clarke's fitness.. And a team without its captain is more vulnerable.
  • Finally, Brad Haddin. He hasnt played since he jarred his shoulder in the desert. Add to that the very real possibility that he will have to perform the dual role of keeper and captain for some portion of this test, and maybe this series. Add also to the mix that his lead bowlers are both coming off long injury layoffs. The longer India bats, the greater the pressure. And with a bum shoulder, on a hot day, a dropped catch by the captain, and who knows ....
And then there are the square boundaries, shorter than the straight boundaries at the Adelaide Oval. And the risk/reward with the hook/pull isnt as skewed as say, Perth of Melbourne.


Read more...

Phil Hughes is yours and Phil Hughes is mine

by Gaurav Sethi

Your heart’s fallen out and your tears have all but made it to the ground
You can’t make no sense of any of this
This was not supposed to happen on a field of cricket
This was not supposed to happen to one of us
This was not supposed to
Happen
It’s just a game, fuck, it’s just a game
Why is the game fucking us so

My best mate’s a gonner
Fell face flat in front of my eyes
Where are the doctors
When will they bring him back to life?

Fuck, what have I done
It was only 135 kmph, son
Fuck, what have I done
You just bowled the ball, son
Fuck, what have I done
He just missed the ball, son
Fuck, what have I done?
It wasn’t a beamer, it didn’t slip from your hand, you bowled as you did, a hundred thousand times before
Fuck, what have I done?
Don’t crucify yourself, son
Help them help you pull the blame and the pain apart, they’re not one and the same, they’re not one and the shame

I know now he’s a country boy from a banana farm and if cricket didn’t happen he’d still be peeling away
I know his smile better than any cricket smile
It’s etched so deep and etched so young
It’s etched so deep makes you wanna weep
The way he talks with a nervous stutter
I wanna protect him when we go back Live
And the cricket plays out
The way it was s’posed to play out

And I hardly knew him
And I hardly saw him play
Yet in spite of those low scores and no scores against spin
How I loved the way he stretched all over the place
And sort of smothered the spin
And I’ve never said that before except in my mind

And there was this bugger called Dennis Freedman
Who went on and on for the last many months on twitter
How he should play for country
Just look at those scores
And he didn’t stop there
He went on and on
And I feel so sad for him.

But we all feel Dennis’ pain
And it’s not because we thought he should play for country
But because we saw cricket die before our eyes
Because we saw a bit of ourselves die

Put out your bats
Hang out your tears to dry
Hang your heart on the line
Phil Hughes is yours and Phil Hughes is mine.

Read more...

David Warner sulks

by Gaurav Sethi

click on cartoon

Read more...

The clarity of a selfish cricketer.

by Gaurav Sethi

Mahela didn’t do much for the first half of the IPL. Then Sanga, his Punjab skip, made him open - a hundred was followed by many more impact innings. That form continues into the World T20, 100, 98, he’s scoring like Dilshan used to, only more.

Then you have Gambhir, DD skipper. He drops down so Warner can open with Sehwag. Their opening doesn’t click yet Gambhir continues with them; both Sehwag and his form worsens, from patchy to scratchy. At that point, I did think it both selfless and stupid of Gambhir to open with Warner. Reckon the Aussie coach prevailed.

Now Gambhir finds himself opening for India. Facing his DD spearhead, Nannes. What does he do – not much, it’s been a while he opened; anything other than his mouth.

As for Warner, all that time spent opening in India, facing spinners, sure helped him. What does he do - rams 6s of spinners like he grew up facing them.

I don’t know if Gambhir realises it, but he’s lost his clarity, simplicity, aloofness. He should stop trying to be somebody he isn’t – drop the talk, bat.

Read more...

Cliche!

by Homer

I am a Mumbaikar.Have been one all my life. No, that is not the cliche.

And one of the important rites of passage that comes along with being a Mumbaikar, in addition to traveling in locals during peak hours and speaking Hinglish, is playing tennis and rubber ball cricket in the galli.Or a maidan, if you are so lucky. Or are living in Navi Mumbai.

Rubber and Tennis ball ( not to be confused with tape ball) cricket meant that anyone with reasonable pace could bang the ball in short and have the batsman playing anywhere between his chest and head. Or higher.

Playing in the maidan also meant a few mandatory rules. Under no circumstances were runs behind the wicket allowed. And often times, because of a lack of quorum, runs on the offside were disallowed too.

Which meant that the bread and butter shots were the front of the wicket hook and pull.. Variants included the lofted drive and the ada patta shot.

Which in turn meant that almost all, if not everyone in my group was a good puller and hooker of the ball.. Not so much a driver, because hitting the ball along the carpet with a packed leg side field, drew much scorn. From your team mates.

Anywho, this is the background.

And on the basis of this back ground, here comes the main story.
We went to Murud Janjira on a school excursion. Where, in our infinite wisdom, we decided to play cricket. On the beach. Correction - on a sandy beach. Plenty of hoo haaing later ( "will the ball bounce?", "how many tappa before the ball is called dead", " should we pull in the boundaries because the ball wont carry", "lets play under arm instead"), the game got underway.
And it took just one delivery for all of our preconceived notions to go out through the window.
For, a field that read five in the deep on the onside and four on the off, changed to two slips, point, short cover, forward short leg, short square leg, deep fine and a short midwicket.
For no one, and I mean no one,had accounted for either the skid or the bounce on that sandy strip.
Batsmen used to playing the pull and the hook were top edging balls, plenty of balls were going off the splice of the bat and there wasnt one front foot shot played in anger that afternoon.
Which brings me to the reason for this post - this little passage on Cricinfo

Dinda v Warner: The first over of Delhi's chase. Ashok Dinda sent down four successive dot balls, all of them short of a length and skidding into the left-hander David Warner, hurrying and cramping him. Warner attempted to short-arm jab three of those on the leg side but failed. The fifth was straighter and quicker. It skidded through Warner's defences before he brought his bat down and demolished off stump. For a batsman reared on the hard and fast surfaces of Australia, Warner was surprisingly beaten by Dinda's pace.


In trying to explain Warner's failing against Dinda, the writer resorted to a tired cliche - that because Warner is Australian, it is automatic that he is a good player of pace.(And that wickets in Australia are fast and hard) And he may well be, but what the writer forgot, or deliberately omitted, is the fact that prior to the game in Kolkata, Delhi had played three games on the trot at the Kotla. And given the nature of the Kotla wicket, with a tendency to stay on the lower side and stop a bit, it wasn't much of a surprise that Warner was late first up when playing under the lights on a slightly bouncier and skiddier Eden Gardens track.
Because it was a matter of adjustment. And swishing across the line without taking into account either the wicket or the conditions is just bad batting. Whether you are Australian, Indian or a poor old sod from the maidans of Mumbai.
And sometimes, the explanation is just that simple.. Without resorting to cliches.

Read more...

A day of daredevilry.

by bored cricket crazy indians

First the Jatman – 146 runs on the rocks. Then Dilshan, “hit me with a 160”. After that Nehra, shaken not stirred. If Rajkot was a bartender, these Dardevils were alcoholics.

Elsewhere Vettori started by snacking on two wickets, setting the Kiwis for a series win. Not to be, but then Vettori doesn’t play all Daredevil games. If he was a regular, who knows, a five for, followed by fireworks with the bat.

Even Asif, an erstwhile Daredevil lasted ten deliveries for his zero. His innings was such a dampener, it roped in the rains that robbed the Kiwis of a win.

And what about the other ex-Daredevil, Shoiab Malik; though not playing, and largely useless, he still booked his spot for the series down under.

Meanwhile Amit Mishra was letting it rip in the nets. If that wasn’t enough, David Warner ran two apartment blocks to catch a ball from another game. “Not out!” said the umpire, but David continued to smile impishly. And the whole world smiled; with the Daredevils.

Read more...

West Indies Vs Australia - Achettup's Moment

by achettup

Obviously everyone's moments will include one or the other, maybe all of Gayle's massive sixes. No exception here. But we need a few distinct moments outside of that breathtaking innings and I'm going to pick a similar strike by young David Warner. In a star studded line-up, the little beefy Aussie played the best innings and helped Australia move on from a disastrous start to reasonable position from where David Hussey cut loose. I choose Warner's meaty six that landed in the Tennis courts that got the commentary boxes buzzing... for it was nothing but an ominous sign and none picked what was about to follow.

Read more...

Q's DDD Prophecy Coming Alive

by Q

Who did I tell that when Sehwag comes back, he will let Gambhir and Warner open?

I don't remember who it was, I think it was in a discussion with either SP or NC.

I also mentioned that Delhi Daredevils will keep Vettori on the bench because of his expensive ways and that they would go in with an explosive batting line up of Gambhir, Warner, Sehwag, Dilshan, and AB.

Well that prophecy has come true right in front of our eyes!

Delhi's in, Sehwag's in the XI, Gambhir and Warner are opening, the explosive batting line up is intact, and Vettori is out.

SP, you're not the only one with a spiritual connection to an IPL team ;-)

Read more...

letting go one in hand...

by Bored Member

for two in bush…that is…

so the prolific scorer in shikhar dhawan has been swapped with another ‘prolific’ bowler in nehra…for a player who is yet to prove his credentials at international level...

apparently after signing warner delhi dare devil's think tank has gone on leave, thinking this season's trophy is as good as theirs…or what else can explain this stupid move…

perhaps they should have listened to what this proven genius has to say about this un-proven kid...

"We could have signed him but I said 'no, he's only done it twice at domestic level, let him prove himself first."

Shane Warne


time will tell how successful warner will be under indian conditions…but for me, dare devils have already betrayed delhi's trust...as there is one old saying which goes like this…

never let go your old relationships for forming new ones…

Read more...

Does Warner warrant a song?

by Gaurav Sethi

Does Warner warrant a song?
Does Warner warrant a song?

It’s only t20 and y’know how that can pan out
Before a blink how you can wham out
You may not end up as one George Michael
But long forgotten, like some Andrew Ridgeley

Y’know the Delhi Daredevils
Blessed this babe with a lump-sum contract
That same IPL blamed for the player’s predicament
Now appears no less than a heavensent

Hallelujah!
Hallelujah!

But does Warner warrant a song?
Does Warner warrant a song?

He may not wear an MCC blazer
But how he blazed in the MCG, a pleasure!
If that ground ain’t big
Then the Kotla ain’t small

Sehwag, Gambhir, ‘n’ even Dilshan unfreezed
Seize the moment, seize the day
The sun is shining, you’re about to make hay
Hell, with the Daredevils you’re about to play

Warner warrants a song!
Warner warrants a song!

Read more...

Subcontinental Headlines No More

by Bored Member

By Q

Despite the English and the Australians holding the claim for bringing the game to the globe, the subcontinent seemed to make the game their own.

The exciting occurrences of a new young player making the headlines, a thrilling run chase with last ball wins, all bowled hatricks, reverse swinging demolitions of oppositions to snatch victories from impossible positions were always associated with the Pakistans and Indias of the world.

All this while the English and the Australians went about their business with expected calm and composure.

The Australians winning everything in clinical fashion and the English losing everything.

With the pulsating positives came the dark negatives as well.

Revolts against the captain, dressing room rifts among team mates, player-management arguements, factions within the team, fixing matches, relationship with bookies, ball tampering, visits to the match referee, fines, bans, you name it and the subcontinental players were in the limelight for everything wrong.

As much as they were for 16 year old debuts, 10 wicket hauls on debuts, youngest to score centuries, fastest 50s and 100s, first to 10,000 test runs, most 6s, first to 500 ODI wickets, and a whole lot more.

Then something changed.

Indians, Lankans, Pakistanis went into the background and the non-Asians, for lack of a better word, started to emerge.

Emerge with a bang to put it aptly.

The calendar changed from 2008 to 2009 and within 11 days the headlines seemed like lightning bolts.

A captain asked for the removal of the coach, while the coach remained quiet.

An emergency board meeting later the captain and coach were both gone, apparently resigned, and a new captain was put in charge.

News of rifts, factions, dressing room arguements surfaced.

The outgoing captain finally spoke and said that he was forced to leave, unlike we were told initially by the board.

All this and it did not involve a team from the subcontinent. In fact, the entire drama unfolded faster and with more twists and turns than any subcontinental drama in the past.

Elsewhere, another cricketer was forced to miss a match because he had one too many the night before, and was "inadequately prepared".

Night out partying and that too not for the first time and facing disciplinary measures sounds like a cricketer from the subcontinent outskirts suddenly exposed to the big bad world of international cricket.

Not quite right, as yet again the headlines were splashed by a non-Indian, non-Pakistani, non-Lankan cricketer.

His replacement for the match was a young 22 year old whom not many had heard of.

Had you? I hadn't.

He grabbed the opportunity with both hands and turned out to open in place of his drunk-and-dumped mate and smashed a debut ton.

It wasn't long ago when young players from India and Pakistan, whom not many had heard of, were being thrust on to the big stage.

Yet again, not this time.

This one wasn't even the most scintillating debut of the year, which is a mere 11 days old.

Nearby, another 22 year old was elevated to the international stage against arguably the best pace attack in the world today.

Awesome would be an understatement for what the young kid produced.

Here was another young cricketer, whom not many had heard of. Whats more is that he became the first ever cricketer in the country's century a bit old cricket history to play an international match without ever having played a first class game.

There was a time when such things were the order of the day for India and Pakistan. In their history, there have been numerous instances of boys spotted in the streets and thrust into international action with no first class experience whatsoever.

This time this headline belonged to no one from the Subcontinent.

It has taken the non-Asians 11 days this year to turn the tables and deliver headlines of the subcontinental nature.

Is the world a changed place? Are the Australians and the English and the Kiwis taking over? I haven't even mentioned the South Africans whose captain walked out at the fall of the 9th wicket to try and save the match with literally one hand!

If the first few days of 2009 are anything to go by, the year ahead will see a lot more drama, both on and off the field, and for a change it will not involve anyone from the Subcontinent.

Read more...