Bored Members - Guests | Media | White Bored | Interview | Bored Anthem - Songs | Boredwaani | Cartoons | Facebook | Twitter | Login
Showing posts with label VVS Laxman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label VVS Laxman. Show all posts

How Kohli and Kumble should be blamed for India's defeat

by Gaurav Sethi

Not to forget, Tendulkar, Ganguly and Laxman
India could have won the Champions Trophy, and everything being written about them would've been quite different. It was one game, it doesn't change much about this team, what it achieved in this tournament or before it.
But the defeat gives an opportunity to look at what's wrong, far more clinically than otherwise. There are lacks, in this post I've already spoken about selection issues, the perils of picking only four front-line bowlers, and Virat Kohli's RCB mindset.
What may go unnoticed is, the disintegration of the BCCI as a non-negotiable power centre. Previously, even at the height of Tendulkar or Dhoni's powers, no star player could (not in the press at least) take on open negotiations with the BCCI.
Virat Kohli, along with the coach, Anil Kumble, have taken it upon themselves to start a conversation with the BCCI on pay concerns of players. It was noted that the two barged into the BCCI office, with Kohli snapping at the office bearers, "Show me the money!" And with Anil Kumble adding for good measure, "shouldn't that be your agent's line? Oh right, you are an agent of change, Virat".
It is reported that Kumble proceeded in a headmasterly fashion to dictate to Kohli (in front of the BCCI office bearers) the Dos and Don'ts of negotiations. This didn't go down too well with Kohli, who next quoted Pink Floyd, "Hey teacher, leave them kids alone, All in all, it's just another brick in the wall". Kumble was distraught at Kohli's attempt to use a song to make his point. The two saw eye-to-eye when discussing Cheteshwar Pujara's case, how for a Grade A player without an IPL contract he was making less money than say, "someone like X, Y or Z does in a few weeks of f**cking around on the field".
Even though Kumble and Kohli returned buoyed by their belligerence, the cracks were too obvious to ignore. Messages to BCCI babus were being leaked and misinterpreted to the press. By taking on the BCCI together, the Kumble-Kohli duo had taken on the wrath of the Indian Board, weakened like Sauron but still The Dark Lord of Mumbai. The Board's wrath fell upon the two.
Going into the Champions Trophy, news of a rift as wide as the Grand Canyon between the two was everywhere – even in Women's magazines that had nothing to do with cricket under normal circumstances. This was far from normal though. Neither captain nor coach refuted the claims, and that only fed the flames.
There were rumours of the entire team sledging Kumble with Pink Floyd's, "Hey Teacher, leave them kids alone". The press was buzzing with talk of a new coach. A disobedience movement to spite Kumble was underway, players were eating paranthas and butter chicken for breakfast. Instead of training, they were gaming, right under Kumble's nose.
But how then did India make it to the finals? Great teams don't become ordinary overnight; they do after a sustained bout of madness, however. After weeks of excess, on the morning of 18th June, four out of five players woke up with hyperacidity, a few others had diarrhea. Others were just feeling lazily elegant, and one guy was clearly overstepping the line during the pre-match strategy meeting. He kept saying, "I'm a beach Bum' hurrah, don't expect much from me today".
Kumble would have intervened but he had been locked in the loo. The mutiny on the bounty was set for a re-screening. And Kohli's revolt was complete, every player was at his revolting best, they had disposed of the headmaster. It was then that Kumble messaged Kohli and three others (SRT, VVS, SCG) - "Help, locked in the loo and I don't have my SLR".
VVS appeared with Kumble's SLR, gave it to his old mate but then locked him in again. As the match started, Tendulkar was spotted in a dazzling printed shirt with a few buttons open. What nobody knows is that Tendulkar was stuck in traffic and only made it once the match had started. Kohli was distraught, he wanted to start the 'big finals' against the 'old foe' with blessings from his cricket 'God' and mentor. Without these blessings, he was going mental -he refused to use his main strike bowler, Kedar Jadhav, till it was already too late.
Worse, during the innings break, none of the players went to the loo as they didn't want to let Kumble out. By some, this is being seen as a reason the Indians were so full of sh*t when they came out to bat. Except for Hardik Pandya, who crossed over to the Pakistani dressing room and was a much-relieved man, until Jadeja appeared out of nowhere, knocking at his door - "Come out already, you're next".
Instead of meeting Tendulkar, the Indian team met Ganguly who gave each player a pep talk but undid all the good work by mispronouncing everybody's name - he really got stuck into Dhawan's ear with leftie-to-leftie advise, "Shekhar, you're a good bat, Shekhar, you will have to be the one to launch the counter attack on Mohammad Amul…" By the time he was done with Umesh Yadav, who he kept calling Shivlal, the Indians were on the brink.
It didn't help, that after Ganguly, the players met a mirthful VVS Laxman. He emptied the world's clichés on the team - with a "you have to perform to the best of your abilities and not squander any opportunities that come your way and first get your eye in and then capitalize on the bad ball" being his standard routine to the batsmen and "maintain a good line and length, look to bowl in good areas, force the batsmen to make a mistake, and keep it tight, I'm confident you will do well and end up on the winning side" his set for the bowlers. By the time he was done, the Indians had keeled over.
It was only when Hardik Pandya went out to bat that Kumble was a free man again. He and Kohli looked at each other in the eye. Kohli looked at Kumble's strong jawline and commented, "Eh…you've got a strong chin, Anil bhai". To which Kumble said, "Eh…I can't see yours…it's hidden by your beard". The awkwardness between the two was stifling.
Kedar Jadhav had just been dismissed, India was 72/6. Jadeja was about to walk out to bat. Kumble spoke, "Just stay with Pandya, don't do anything silly". Just to contradict Kumble, Kohli said, "No, no, please do something silly"
Kumble looked at Kohli with a wry smile, "think I was better off in the loo".
(However plausible this may sound, this is largely a work of fiction.)

First published here

Read more...

Anil Kumble turned up for the job interview in bandages

by Gaurav Sethi

India has a desi coach after a string of firangs somehow got by without knowing the language. Yet, knowing the language was one of the prerequisites this time.
What language, you may ask - there are so many, which is possibly why someone like Anil Kumble who speaks not only English and Hindi, but also Kannada and engineering, scored the highest marks in the coach’s final exam.
Anil Kumble, it is learnt, has developed a wicked sense of humour, and had his mates in splits, when he turned up for the job interview in bandages. Reminiscent of the time when he returned to bowl, jaw broken and bandaged, and grab Brian Lara’s wicket; Sachin, Sourav and VVS, all stood up and hi-fived him, as they did on the field, that day in Antigua.
When asked what he was thankful for, Kumble thanked the broken jaw: "It was a flat deck, worse than our Indian roads that we call wickets. I’m glad I broke my jaw and only bowled 14 of the 248 overs that India bowled.”
To which Laxman cracked up, and said in his usual jovial self, "Aneel, even I bowled 17 overs haha, you’re very lucky Aneel, I agree, you’re a very lucky guy."
At this point, Tendulkar jumped out of his seat to admonish Laxman, "Aila! 17 overs, what is that, I bowled 34 overs that day! We should make Anil coach just so that we can force him to bowl more overs in the nets."
Sourav Ganguly, all serious so far, wasn’t about to be left out when he said in his usual deadpan manner, "One of the advantages of being captain is that I bowled only 12 overs in that innings." He looked around for approval which he got in spades from the little private club.
Laxman blamed Ganguly, alleging that because of that Test match, where Ashish Nehra bowled 49 overs in an innings, he was never fully fit again. "You killed Nehra the bowler for life, Sourav, hehehe... and Zak too, and Srinath too. How can you make your quicks all bowl close to 50 overs? You were a heartless captain."
Ganguly corrected him, "Medium pacers, VVS, not quicks, medium pacers."
The banter went on, when Tendulkar decided to do a Q&A on the Test match, "How many bowlers bowled for India? And no, you cannot Google it, Anil."
Kumble looked on sternly, asking matter-of-factly, "Will this question decide whether I make it as coach?"
Tendulkar nodded.
There was a deafening silence in the room. After a few minutes of levity it was all down to one question.
Kumble started to toss the player’s names in his head – and then it came to him, he had just visited Ajay Ratra’s (the wicketkeeper in that match) cricket profile.
A thorough researcher, Kumble had looked at every aspect of Ratra’s career – he also noticed he had bowled six balls in a Test match. That one over had to be in the Antigua Test.
Where else? If Laxman could bowl 17 overs in a Test, even the twelfth man had a chance to bowl.
Anil Kumble’s already firm jaw appeared more determined as he looked Sachin, Sourav and Laxman collectively in the eye. It was as if he was interviewing them for a post. He nodded ever so slightly and started a roll call of the team, listing every player, and then laying a greater emphasis on Ajay Ratra’s name.
To which, Sachin and Sourav were poker-faced but Laxman let out the hint of a smile.
In Kumble’s mind, it was either ten or eleven players who had bowled. Spotting Laxman’s smile, Kumble went for the jugular: "All 11 bowled in that Test match, including the one over from Ajay Ratra. Sourav, I do think for his economy rate, he was a trifle underbowled. Let me tell you, as India coach, I won’t let the wicketkeeping duties come in the way of bowling. I expect MS to turn his arm over."
There was a gentle applause. Laxman called a peon in and requested Kumble to dictate his appointment letter.
But Ganguly was all serious, "Sorry Anil, but we have to ask you one more question, how do you plan to improve India’s performance overseas?"
They all laughed heartily. It was a question asked many times before. The masters in the room knew only too well there were no real answers yet. Still, a man's got to ask.
Anil Kumble started his PowerPoint presentation. Laxman insisted there wasn’t any need. Long after Kumble’s appointment letter had been printed and signed, he continued to present, talking about the future.
(However plausible this may sound, this is largely a work of fiction.)
First published here

Read more...

After Under-19 team, Rahul Dravid to coach retired cricketers

by Gaurav Sethi

Legend says new challenges keep him refreshed
You would think that coaches at the Under-19 World Cup have precious little free time. Not Rahul Dravid though. After the shellacking handed out to Nepal by his wards, he made a courtesy call on the vanquished side.
He emphasised the need for strike-rotation, even taking a dig at himself, "I'm a good one to speak, as I often would get stuck at one end myself. Guess you live, you learn, you become coach and you get to preach".
By the end of his session, he had the deflated Nepal side in splits. Some of the Nepal U-19 players wanted autographs which Dravid obliged with individual messages - everything from "Rotate strike" to "Outside off not leg".
Dravid also spent time in the Pakistan and Canada camps, talking to their coaches, managers, players. In the Pak camp, he lightened the mood saying he won't be able to answer all their questions because even though Pakistan beating India in a World Cup match is highly unlikely, if it does come to pass, he could be tried for espionage.
Plenty of selfies were taken in spite of stiff resistance from Dravid, "Hey, I'm an old-fashioned guy, used to cameras without phones".
After the Mankading incident in the West Indies - Zimbabwe match, Dravid was requested to meet both the teams and share his opinion on the incident. For once, Dravid didn't take the bait and excused himself claiming he had pressing coaching assignments. When asked, which team, he laughed, "surprisingly, my team!"
Buzz around the U-19 World Cup is that the International Cricket Council (ICC) has requested Dravid to consider taking a mentoring role for upcoming cricketing nations.
It is also learnt that Dravid has been offered a fresh assignment by the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) - "to coach out of shape retired cricketers who are hell-bent on making fools of themselves" by taking part in tournaments such as Cricket All-Stars (played in the United States) and the Masters Champions League (MCL), currently being played in the United Arab Emirates.
A furious BCCI senior official thumped his table as he made a strong point: "We can't have our legends playing as if they've never played cricket before. What other nations do with their retired players is their business but we want Rahul Dravid to replicate his Under-19 success with the seniors"
Sourav Ganguly, (Libra Legends' captain in the MCL), who pulled out because of a back spasm even before the tournament started, could well be his old teammate's first assignment. There are rumours that once Ganguly regains fitness, his new coach will be a hard taskmaster when it comes to fielding drills and running between the wickets, something "Dada" has never quite enjoyed.
Dada said he was fine with Dravid as coach, as long as "that Greg Chappell doesn't accompany him".
Dravid's appointment as coach of retired cricketers could also see him looking into players who are no longer active on the field but active in other unsavoury ways. The BCCI has long seen Kambli as a wild child and it is believed that Dravid could talk some sense into the once prolific school cricketer who failed to live up to his potential in the Indian team.
Sachin Tendulkar refused to comment on Dravid's latest assignment.
VVS Laxman, on the other hand, more than made up for him on TV: "Sooper! This is very good of BCCI to appoint Dravid I must say. I have full faith in Dravid that he will do an excellent job to the best of his abilities and will get the full support of the players, I mean retired players hehehe... Even I can't wait to restart our partnership, hopefully we will train in Eden Gardens hehehe. We have good memories of that ground... hehehe ok commercial break? Take it, I'm not going anywhere hehehe..."
Meanwhile Virender Sehwag (captain of Gemini Arabians) shot from the hip when he said, "Retirement is for relaxation, hope Rahul Dravid doesn't make me train too hard".
(However plausible this might sound, this is largely a work of fiction.)

Read more...

May the four be with you

by Gaurav Sethi

Over to Raina, Yuvraj, Jadeja and Dhawan

Even before Suresh Raina had faced a ball in the third Twenty20 against Australia, this tweet was sent:
In the recent ODI series against South Africa, Raina had fallen to extravagant shots way too early in his innings against leg spinner, Imran Tahir. Raina was dismissed by Tahir on the third and second deliveries he faced for 3 and 0, on both occasions trying to hit out.
Facing leg spinner, Cameron Boyce’s second delivery, Raina came down the wicket aiming to deposit the ball in the Sydney Opera House.  Instead, wicketkeeper, Cameron Bancroft missed a note and a stumping. Raina st Cameron b Cameron 0(2) was not to be.

Rain went on to play some fine angles behind the wicket. While one century and two fifties fell short, Raina’s 49 took India across the line.

Often because of his Test career, Raina appears to be a rookie. He made his ODI debut over 15 years back. He’s played over 220 games. His batting average may only be 35 but he strikes at nearly 94. Dhoni has often spoken of how Raina is one of the few players who can hit the big shot from the get go. Lately, Dhoni even defended Raina’s dismissals against Imran Tahir.

Dhoni has and continues to believe in Raina. In the Srinivasan era, this belief in Raina meant a confirmed ODI spot. Off late, not so hunky dory. After the defeat in Bangladesh, quite a few regulars, including Raina, were rested and Ajinkya Rahane was made captain for the Zimbabwe tour.  After the series loss against South Africa, Raina was not picked for the one-day series against Australia.

Raina’s lack of one-day form though has not been confused with his value as a T20 player. By now you would’ve heard VVS Laxman wax ineloquent on Suresh Raina being the highest run scorer in the IPL.

That’s the least of it. His T20 international average and strike rate are nearly as high as his IPL numbers and he has a high percentage of not outs, so you can expect him to close matches. Raina adds value as a fielder (you don’t need VVS to tell you that) and will turn his arm round in Indian conditions. And by now you would know, Dhoni doesn’t want one dimensional cricketers but players who have an added skill, “like Raina like Yuvraj, who can bowl that one or two overs if need be”.

Yuvraj Singh’s international strike rate is 12 more than his domestic one – 144 to 132 – his international average is 5 more than his domestic one, 32 to 27. And you don’t need VVS or Dhoni to tell you what he’s won India. While Yuvraj has often fallen short of expectations for his IPL franchises, it has little bearing on the hopes he raises when playing for India.

So does India pick Yuvraj on a prayer? Or to tease his dad? Or to tease themselves? In the course of his first hit in the middle, it shifted from baffling to becoming, when dots added up, only to be cleaned out, with a flick for four and a smack for six.

Oh, Yuvi.

He bowled in all three games and dismissed Glenn Maxwell twice even before either bowler or batsman could settle in. Unlike the other left arm spinner, Ravindra Jadeja, who can crank it up to Kumblelike speeds, Yuvraj is slow, and the ball seems to reach the other end, almost belatedly.

So far it has all been about Jadeja’s bowling, the batting hasn’t been tested for a while - his highest score is 25, average less than 10, strike rate less than 90. Slated to bat after Hardik Pandya at eight, Jadeja’s batting wasn’t required in the series. In the IPL though, Jadeja can be a bully with the bat, recall his early days at Rajasthan Royals or that match when he laid siege on the Mumbai Indians? He scored 25 off 11 balls to undermine Sachin Tendulkar’s only T20 century.

It’s debatable whether Jadeja can still close games like Faulkner used to; what, these days even Faulkner can’t. Just as Yuvraj and Raina are batting allrounders to stretch it, Jadeja is very much a bowler first. The World Twenty20 on Indian tracks is a godsend for Jadeja. He could be one of the players of the tournament with a Swisslike precision with his bowling, fielding off his own bowling (refer Watson caught and bowled in second T20), diving catches in the outfield (refer Lynn catch in third T20) and of course, do reference all those missile throws from the deepest boundary outposts.

From ‘rockstar’ to ‘sir’, Jadeja continues to evolve, and unlike most modern cricketers, he really does let his cricket and VVS speak for himself. Possibly, by the end of this World T20, Jadeja would earn himself another nickname.

Perhaps the most worrisome left handed batsman of the lot is Shikhar Dhawan. As an opener in 11 matches, he’s yet to score a half century. To his credit, the sample size of 11 matches is small and he did make his highest score, 42, in this series; he followed it with a whacking 29 off just 9 balls to set up the chase in real earnest. At his best, Dhawan is capable of homicidal batting, that too when the others seem to be failing collectively. As he’s often shown in the other formats, he can go through magical phases where he scores in clusters just like Virat Kohli and Rohit Sharma are doing now. If either or both Kohli and Sharma go through a run drought, he could be the man to bail India out on top. The team management has backed him through some lean patches, and it’s obvious, Dhawan is India’s first choice opener along with Sharma.

When India won the World Twenty20 in 2007 they had three left handed batsmen: Gautam Gambhir, Yuvraj Singh, Irfan Pathan. This time they have four.

To paraphrase Star Wars, “May the four be with you”.

Read more...

Why VVS couldn't invite MSD

by bored cricket crazy indians

click on cartoon to enlarge


by  SP + NC



Based on this tweet by @straightpoint

Read more...

Sachin Tendulkar's worst nightmare

by Gaurav Sethi

click on cartoon to enlarge

Read more...

After his retirement

by Gaurav Sethi

click on cartoon to enlarge

Read more...

Why VVS Laxman decided to retire

by Gaurav Sethi


Read more...

Watch the first episode of THE WHITE BORED - why has India lost it

by bored cricket crazy indians




Produced by Yash Chawla, NDTV. Rambling by Bored Member NC.
Shot on location at The Bored Room, Yawn T Roads. 

Read more...

Fickle Me This, Fickle Me That, Who's Afraid Of The Media's Crap?

by achettup

Pardon the corny headline, it is at least in keeping with the low standards set by cricket's general newsmedia. Ricky Ponting struggles for a year and a bit, the press demands his head, he scores a hundred in vain during the World Cup quarterfinal and retains his batting position but loses the captaincy. Michael Clarke scored 151 against South Africa, an innings described by many as one of the best of the year. Australia were bowled out for 47, Clarke and his men are slaughtered by the press for being unable to bat with the necessary temperament. Australia win a thriller against South Africa to level the 2 match series, the press said Haddin, Ponting and Hussey had done enough to survive another day.

Australia lose to New Zealand at home, Clarke's captaincy is questioned, everyone thinks Ponting should call it a day. Australia win at the MCG, a match that was competitive for a while, the media still demands Ponting's head, Clarke's captaincy is reflected on as being better than Dhoni's, not much of a compliment considering the Indian skipper's leadership during the match. Clarke scores 329, Ponting scores a hundred, as does Hussey and suddenly everyone's glad Ponting has decided to stick around, and Clarke gets rich accolades for his brilliant captaincy.

While the flip-flops are typical of media - no less than Gideon Haigh, whom many accord the title of the best contemporary writer in the sport because of his commanding vocabulary and presumptuous and often misinformed opinion, has had to eat humble pie after yet another of his tiring pieces on T20's included that wonderful question about whether David Warner would ever bat more than 60 balls in his career - that has devolved from stating the facts to jingoistic misinformed opinion pieces, its how they misuse the responsibility handed to them and the privilege of freedom accorded to them that disappoints. The media heavily influences readers who are unable to make their own minds on the state of affairs either because they don't have access to information or because they trust a paper that echoes views they want to hear. Which is what news media has become, rather sadly even in cricket.

There is always an agenda behind a piece, sometimes paid for, and almost always influenced by how many eyeballs can be brought to glance at the myriad of ads strategically placed near the provocative headlines. Cricinfo has often used inflammatory headlines simply to spark a controversy for what is a poorly written piece about nothing in particular. Along with sections of the British and Australian press, they have successfully pulled wool over the blinkered eyes of the majority of cricket's followers into believing the BCCI's sole purpose for existence is greed and the eventual destruction of cricket. Rarely are there any articles about the BCCI's many development projects, some of which are quite admirable. The BCCI of course don't help matters by banning some groups from attending matches and refusing to promote their own successful endeavours sufficiently.

Take the DRS for instance. The BCCI's stand isn't that they don't want the DRS, but rather that the technology behind it isn't foolproof, and until it is there is hardly any point in using it to influence decisions wherein it might only add to further controversy, as was quite evident during India's tour of England. Most people who have bothered looking at the facts agree that this is a sensible outlook. Yet there are people who leave comments such as "Why does India have a right to overrule Cricket Australia's use of the DRS" primarily because the piss-poor variety of journalists like Malcolm Conn mislead people with statements proclaiming the BCCI directly denies bowlers the ability to appeal. Not too surprisingly, -and whether they see it or not, its what they choose to write based on their audience's mood at the moment-  Conn and the like have led the way with adulations over Clarke's captaincy, which not too long ago they questioned.

Clarke has benefited from having a good set of bowlers who've done well at home against a side that has for the most part had a perennial weakness against quick bowlers on seaming wickets. His captaincy against tailenders was as bad as Dhoni's in recent times, and when the game has drifted away from him he looks as lost as his predecessor, who was also falsely proclaimed as a great captain based on his stock of players. Clarke plays it up of course, his decision to declare while admirable is a touch nauseous, and reminds of his decision to dump Lara Bingle when it appeared *her* character might have cost him the captaincy [this criteria in picking a skipper is a topic for another day, Warne , Ponting etc etc...]. But the media is blind to all of this at the moment, the flavor of the moment is Michael - benevolent pup - Clarke, and so logical discourse takes a back seat.

Move over to the Indian media, which swings with more regularity than a pendulum. The usual scapegoat, VVS Laxman, finds that he is about to be axed in the country that he has his best record against. Laxman has often been treated unfairly by the Board, more often by the media, but he doesn't do his case too much good by remaining among the slackest of fielders and runners in the game. That isn't what he is being picked on for, its whether he should be staying in a team which should look towards rebuilding. Indian cricket's second golden boy, Rahul Dravid, cannot be touched of course, despite looking all at sea since Tendulkar's arrival at the crease in the first innings of the tour. This is because Dravid was the only batsman to do well in England. After 3-4 miserable years where he relied on scoring against weak attacks on flat tracks to retain his position in the team.

One might ask, if Laxman should be axed - as he probably deserves to be based on his recent overseas record - in keeping with blooding the next generation, why not Dravid. Indeed, why not Dravid 2 years ago when he relied on inside edges to score the bulk of his runs. Exactly what did Indian cricket gain from Rahul's recent exploits in England? We lost by the most embarrassing of margins anyway, didn't we? And why did he insist on playing on after the tour, nearing the ripe old age of 39? One paper says Dravid and Laxman will probably decide on their own to retire rather than leave it to the selectors -  which is allegedly their right for their great contributions to Indian cricket - but going by their decisions over the last few years its pretty hard to see that happening, right?

Why were these players, including Sachin, touring Bangladesh, we all asked these questions at the time and its time to ask them again. If the seniors don't take a back seat and let the selectors gracefully blood the next generation, then after a tour like this one they are culpable on two counts - overstaying their welcome and foiling the future. These questions were somehow stowed away by the media after the English debacle, when they chose to pick on the scheduling since it was all the rage back then to ape the British fixation with the IPL's devious influence on the sport.

Ah, the future. And here we see the circus coming full circle. The greats are venerated and paid homage to just as overrated film stars in the country buy undue hype. So to the hype accorded to "the next best thing... well at least for the moment." Currently, on the back of glorious innings on flat tracks in the Ranji trophy, the boy who seems to exude so much talent that for a minute you might ignore the accompanying Mumbai-biased sycophancy, Rohit Sharma has apparently earned his spot in the team. Rohit has earned his spot in the ODI team almost as many times as Yuvraj has in tests, and has disappointed just as many but the trigger happy media searching for a hero are convinced this time will be different, like last time.

If he does well, the poor chap - just look at Kohli who did well in 2011 and now has irked just about everyone after two matches in which his seniors have played with far greater trepidation and irresponsibility - can hope for a year's worth of accolades before being consigned to obscurity like Mukund, Das, Ramesh, Vijay, hell even WV Raman and the plethora of next best things of yesteryear. If he does great, he becomes the next Laxman. And as he rides this journey, the crests and troughs amplified by the irresponsible sensationalist tabloid rubbish masquerading as journalism, he will at times loathe his fans and the media and scoff at their influence over each other and himself.

Read more...

To all those who want Laxman's head...

by RajaB

Before you brandish your machete...

Take a look at this

Read more...

Has VVS Laxman retired from one day cricket?

by Gaurav Sethi

We know for certain Dravid has retired from one day cricket. Even he knows now. But what about Laxman, with his old blues in the closet – he’s exactly where Dravid was before his services were summoned.

Laxman last played an ODI close to 5 years’ back. He scored, er, he didn’t. Somewhat ironical, as Laxman refused to score in his first innings as well. Both ducks against African teams, South Africa and Zimbabwe. His first game against another African team, Kenya, he scored – 1.

Before Dravid’s return in England, his last game too was in South Africa. He scored, gotcha there, 4. He was run out.

When Dravid was made to return against England, he scored 4, 2, 32, 2, 19 and 69. He even got run out in one of those innings.

There really isn’t much of a case for playing Laxman in ODIs. Just as there wasn’t one for Dravid. Doubt he'll do any worse than Dravid though, but there's a romance to it - Laxman in blues, down under. When he played there last, he dished out two 100s in two days.

If he is asked to return, it will only be after a 4-0 drubbing in Australia - and if he pulls off a Dravid-in-England.

Laxman has played 86 ODIs over 8 ½ years – his batting average is 30.76, strike rate 71.23, 6 100s in there. Laxman made his ODI debut when he was 22.

Rohit Sharma made his one-day debut when he was 20 in 2007. So far in over 4 years he’s only played 67 ODIs. His batting average is 31.35, strike rate 77.25, 2 100s in there.

On debut, Rohit scored, er, he didn’t – he wasn’t required to bat. In his last ODI too, he didn’t score  – he was retired hurt on 0.

You could call VVS and Rohit Sharma Mr & Mrs Lazy Elegance. Both are masters of the give-it-away school. Both secretly want to be opposition coaches that conduct catching practice drills.

In spite of his one-day misdemeanours, VVS has moved on, he and test cricket are drinking buddies now.

As for Rohit, he’s shed a few kilos. Where am I going with this? Only Rohit will tell.

Read more...

VVS Laxman in yet another crisis.

by bored cricket crazy indians

Read more...

VVS Laxman's Padma Shri Experience

by Gaurav Sethi


Read more...

VVS Laxman At Post Match Party

by Gaurav Sethi

Read more...

VVS Laxman in a fancy dress.

by Gaurav Sethi

click on cartoon

Read more...

The Laxman Effect

by Gaurav Sethi

"I refuse to clean your shit for you this time...
who do you think I am, VVS Laxman???"

Read more...

Bangalore Boredwaani: Shut Up And Listen

by achettup

This is Bored Broadcasting Corporation's first Boredcast. We got Che, Jatman, Freesanth and Bored members Homer, Straight Point, Achettup and Naked Cricket bringing you a preview of India's second test against Australia. Lend me your ears. 

Read more...

Laxman, an average cricketer.

by Gaurav Sethi

I like averages. Batting averages, bowling averages, the whole lotta them averages, and while they don’t always single out your average Joe, it’s ok by me.

Over time I’ve noticed how Laxman’s average has climbed, from his 44 point something, up and up, and when I look at it now, it’s 47.40. That’s gotta ring to it; if he ends his career with that, Azhar can approach him, and open a gym called 47.40. Anyone know what Azhar’s gym was called?

When I look at his 47.40 average, I think of Laxman as a player with a 50+ average. How would that be, does he deserve a 50+ avg, what am I saying, who deserves an average, it’s calculated. Going by the crates of runs he’s scored in the last few years, he’s almost negated some of those early years, that were all about sexy 30s, and a cut to gully or point’s hands.

When I look at his 47.40 average, I think of Zaheer Abbas’ 44.79 average. Zaheer’s average surprised me, going by runs he scored against India, I expected his average to be 99.94

And now it hits me, while a 50+ average sounds swell for VVS, it doesn’t quite cut it for me – in my book of averages, he’s more a 71.47 player. Here’s to more not-outs. Here’s to our man, Laxman.

Read more...

When 50>200

by Crownish

To be exact, when 73*>204*


A 73* becomes that much more valuable when the best batsman in the world cannot muster more than 38 runs. When the opposition just has to turn their arms over and the pitch will do the rest to dismiss the batsmen. Or the umpire will. When your back hurts so much that you can't stand up, sit down or do anything that won't hurt like a mofo. When all your hard work can be undone by the tiniest error of judgement on someone else's part. When no one around you cannot keep their mind straight with the tension and the excitement and anger and frustration and the hope and disappointment. When you know everything you've done in the past, no matter how great will not be remembered, all that doesn't matter as much as what you're doing now.

The 204* becomes insignificant when it comes from the blade of a captain who refused to enforce the follow on and promoted himself to number 3, having failed in the first innings. When it comes on the back of a 394 run first innings lead. When it comes from someone who thinks the job is done by having made it international cricket, someone who can't understand why people don't remember that neat knock he played that time.

Yuvraj's knock is what should be the stuff of legends, a classic response to doubters but it just doesn't feel right, despite the win. Laxman's knock in a match where either team could have a dozen things to fault for their loss was the reaffirmation of a faith. A fifty that's a hundred times more valuable, more memorable, more significant than a double century.


For more of Crownish's play, visit the fckingblog

Read more...